Craig O. Stewart
PhD, Rhetoric, 2006, Carnegie Mellon University
MS, Cognitive Psychology, 2000, University of Memphis
BS, Psychology, 1997, Lambuth University
I joined the communication department at the U of M in 2009, after three years as
an assistant professor at Old Dominion University. My research ties together my graduate
training in rhetoric and cognitive psychology within the field of discourse studies.
Most of my research focuses on how discourse of and about science is used and understood
in the context of social and political controversies—including stem cell research,
gender and cognition, and “reparative therapy” for homosexuality—and articles based
on this research appear in the journals Communication Theory, Discourse & Society, Science Communication, and Western Journal of Communication, as well as the edited volume Rhetoric in Detail: Discourse Analyses of Rhetorical Talk & Text (John Benjamins, 2008). Recently, I have also carried out research on news media
representations of “illegal immigrants” and on how irony functions within satirical
media discourse. I use both qualitative and quantitative methods in my research and
take a broadly social cognitive perspective on discourse and communication.
I frequently teach Communication Research Methods at the undergraduate level as well
as graduate courses in communication theory, discourse studies, and persuasion.
Communication Research Methods (Undergrad)
Communication Theory (Undergrad & Grad)
Discourse Analysis (Grad)
Persuasion (Undergrad & Grad)
Dickerson, D. L., & Stewart, C. O. (in press). The nature and role of science kits
in affecting change in public understanding of science. In S. Ramanathan (Ed.), Communicating science to the public. New York: Springer.
Riordan, M. A., Markman, K. M., & Stewart, C. O. (2013). Communication accommodation
in instant messaging: An examination of temporal convergence. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 32, 84-95.
Stewart, C. O. (2013a). The influence of news frames and science background on attributions
about embryonic and adult stem cell research: Frames as heuristic/biasing cues. Science Communication, 35, 86-114.
Stewart, C. O. (2013b). Strategies of verbal irony in visual satire: Reading The New
Yorker's "Politics of Fear" cover. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 26, 197-217.
Stewart, C. O., Pitts, M. J., & Osborne, H. (2011). Mediated intergroup conflict:
The discursive construction of "illegal immigrants" in a regional U.S. newspaper.
Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 30, 8-27.
Stewart, C. O. (2009). Socioscientific controversies: A theoretical and methodological
framework. Communication Theory, 19, 124-145.
Stewart, C. O., Dickerson, D. L., & Hotchkiss, R. (2009). Beliefs about science and
news frames in audience evaluations of embryonic and adult stem cell research. Science Communication, 30, 427-452.
Stewart, C. O. (2008a). How a media controversy can influence a scientific publication:
The case of Robert L. Spitzer's "reparative therapy" study. In B. Johnstone & C. Eisenhart
(Eds.), Rhetoric in detail: Discourse analyses of rhetorical talk and text (pp. 255-278). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stewart, C. O. (2008b). Social cognition and discourse processing goals in the analysis
of 'ex-gay' rhetoric. Discourse & Society, 19, 63-83.
Stewart, C. O., Setlock, L. D., & Fussell, S. R. (2007). Conversational argumentation
in decision-making: Chinese and U.S. participants in face-to-face and instant messaging
interactions. Discourse Processes, 44, 113-139.
Honors and Awards
College of Communication and Fine Arts New Faculty Research Initiative Grant, 2010
Technoculture: An Online Journal of Technology in Society, Editorial Board Member, 2013-2015.
University of Memphis, Institutional Review Board (IRB), Member, 2011-present
Southern States Communication Association, Language & Social Interaction Division