The University of Memphis
SACS Home
 
Compliance Home
 
Educational Programs
all programs
 
    3.4.1
    3.4.2
    3.4.3
    3.4.4
    3.4.5
    3.4.6
    3.4.7
    3.4.8
    3.4.9
    3.4.10
    3.4.11
    3.4.12
    3.4.13
    3.4.14
 
undergraduate programs
    3.5.1
    3.5.2
 
graduate programs
    3.6.1
    3.6.2
    3.6.3
 
Faculty
    3.7.1
    3.7.2
    3.7.3
    3.7.4
    3.7.5
 
Library
    3.8.1
    3.8.2
    3.8.3
 
Student Affairs
    3.9.1
    3.9.2
    3.9.3

Compliance Certification Report
Comprehensive Standards 3.4.6


Last Updated Aug 11, 2004
(static edition)


Comprehensive Standards 3.4.6:

The institution employs sound and acceptable practices for determining the amount and level of credit awarded for courses, regardless of format or mode of delivery.

The Institution Certifies Compliance: Yes

Compliance report completed by: Audit Team 19

Statement of Rationale for Judgment of Compliance:

The University of Memphis curriculum approval process ensures that all new and modified courses meet commonly accepted standards for course level and credit. New courses or course revisions are generated by academic departments and forwarded to the appropriate committee for review. Prior to action by the provost, the University Undergraduate Curriculum Committee reviews all undergraduate requests; the University Council for Graduate Studies and Research reviews all graduate requests. Course syllabi, which must include course content and goals, assignments, methods of instruction, and student evaluation, are reviewed in these processes. An example of the syllabus for a geology course is provided. [1]

In the Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law, a faculty member proposing a new course submits a written proposal to the curriculum committee, a group of five faculty members appointed by the law school dean. The committee meets and reviews the course proposal. The committee then decides whether to forward the course to the faculty. A favorable recommendation for course approval from the curriculum committee goes to the faculty, which must ultimately approve all new course offerings.  

At UofM, one credit hour is equivalent to at least 750 classroom contact minutes. Laboratory instruction requires 1500 contact minutes for the same amount of credit. This applies to all terms: fall, spring, summer, or compressed sessions.  When providing nontraditional class formats, the UofM ensures equivalence in terms of instructional time, student effort, and student achievement. [2]

Distance education courses follow SACS principles developed as an extension of the Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education, updated June 2003. [3]


Relevant Organizational Unit(s):

Provost; Vice Provost for Academic Affairs


Supporting Documentation and Evidence:

[1] Course Syllabus
Return to narrative

[2] UofM Curricular Procedures Handbook
Return to narrative

[3]

Commission on Colleges, SACS, Distance Education: Definition and Principles-A Policy Statement

Commission on Colleges, SACS, Best Practices for Electronically Offered Degree and Certificate Programs

Return to narrative




About U of M | Academics | Administration | Admissions
Alumni | Athletics | Calendar & News | Corporate Connections | Employment Opportunities
Extended Programs | Libraries, Museums & the Arts | Research
Ways to Give | Technology at The U of M

Contact Us | Search | Home




Copyright © 2000 The University of Memphis. Site maintained by Web Services. Design by Aristotle ®